
The 1970s were a decade defined by the power of the working-class movement. We may look back now and say that thetrade unions were radical and strong. However, as Willie Black recounts, that strength came from the rank and file. In reality, workers were taking unofficial action and forcing their unions to declare national strike action. Willie talks us through what we need to know for our organising today.
Lydia Hughes: Tell me about your first experiences with organising
Wille Black: I am a seven-days, seven-nights organiser. Always have been. At 16, in 1966, I became employed as an apprentice electrician and ended up immediately in a six-week dispute, which coloured my imagination. Then, our trade union branches met every Monday. There would be 70 or 80 electricians in attendance and it was fever pitch. It was a real baptism of fire.
I was in the company of shop stewards and militants who had rebuilt trade unions throughout the 1960s. But the scale of the shop stewardsâ movement was beginning to develop even further. We constantly clashed with the prevailing political machinery: the government and the trade union bureaucracy. My experience was that no dispute went by as an individual, but as part of a political organisation and a trade union. When I was 18, I was made a shop steward for 120 electricians. I was an apprentice electrician and I got a battering from the management because I knew nothing.
The seventies were a high point of worker self-activity. It influenced me to see that there was a difference between changing leaders and changing how workers were organised. Thatâs how our strong rank-and-file organising came about. There was a period when I was blacklisted from employment during the 1980s. Then I became more of what you could call a community activist.
LH: From your personal involvement, how do you understand workersâ power?
WB: I tell people a story. There was an occupation in Manchester at L Gardner and Sons, a diesel engine builder. We were meeting delegations of the workers. This was a really important part of solidarity. We used to take groups of workers all over the country, whether that was South African trade unionists or Polish workers. After the Portuguese revolution in 1974, we had soldiers that we took round the factories.
It was mainly women who came to Edinburgh to speak about their dispute in Manchester. They had no experience of speaking to the public or union branches. But when they came, everybody was hanging on every word. It was really a great feeling.
We were all in the pub after the trades council meeting, there were probably about 200 delegates there. John, the barman, picked up the phone and it was Gardnerâs negotiating team telling them they had to come back because they had won. They needed them to come back to vote at a mass meeting on the wages and conditions package. We all cheered, there were tears, everybody was really emotional. And then, one of the women said, âDoes that mean we have to go back to work?â
Never give up. You should be a troublemaker, make a difference. Donât go through life looking at things that are bad and do nothing about it. Have courage and step up
That taught me about alienation. That taught me that those women were at the pinnacle of the trade union movement. They were the leaders for the trade union movement at that moment. They had the power to beat the bosses. And they didnât even know they had that power. Their power was expressed by the virtue of the fact that they were everything now. That change that happens in people â thatâs what you need.
LH: Taking action as a collective changes us and builds our confidence. How does your understanding of class influence your organising?
WB: Thereâs only two classes in society. Thereâs the working class â and people who donât even know theyâre working class will soon be taught that they are. Like when you see barristers on strike outside a court with placards and in their wigs. And on the other side, the capitalist class, who donât leave anything to a draw. There is always upset around the corner.
Somebody once said to me, âGod almighty, you cannot watch Coronation Street without talking about class.â You begin to see the world in a particular way when you see that itâs a class struggle and that everything is affected by that. When you canât even see the connection, you can bet your boots, thatâs the class struggle. Itâs in the DNA of the whole system.
The working class comes into being because people work. They are working within the means of production, in factories, offices or whatever. And those workers are constantly on the move. People have a typical vision of the working class. Itâs a whippet, a flat cap, down the pub and working in the factory, the mill or the pit. That ainât the working class, just a section of it. Nevertheless, the working class has to change into a class for itself. Not just a class in itself.
You can have a battle, but if we want to win the war, we need unity. And we have to make sure that trade unions adopt a stance which is welcoming to everybody and that everybodyâs battle comes from the same source. That thereâs them. And thereâs us.
LH: With this understanding, why is it important for the rank and file to organise separately from the bureaucracy?
WB: Right from the start, when trade unions were formed, there has been a conservatism in the nature of the people who look after the machine. The fabric of the union becomes itself something to be protected. Beatrice Webb called people employed directly by the unions âthe civil service of the movementâ. She recognised right from the turn of the 19th century that those officials have different conditions. They are not employers but also not workers. They are a group of people who negotiate your terms and conditions and the price of your labour. It doesnât affect their wages and conditions.
If you see all the anti-trade union laws, itâs about discipline of the rank and file but not directly by the state. They put pressure on the officials to discipline the movement by threatening financial damage to the union for radical action.
LH: Sadly, weâve seen this dynamic play out too many times. Strong rank-and-file organising is needed to give workers the power to take militant action. As a socialist, what motivated your decades of rank-and-file organising?
WB: I think rank-and-file organising in itself is important, to keep the bureaucracy in check. But thatâs not the reason for rank-and-file organisations for people like me. Rank-and-file organisations are the embryo of the future socialist society. Shop stewards, people who have to go back and speak directly to the members, are meeting with other shop stewards from a whole raft of industries in every town or city. We begin to talk about a thing called dual power. Dual power is when youâre creating an alternative vision of society. Then youâre trying to show in practice how that might be.
I was involved in mass meetings, mostly in car parks, where we would use our hands to vote. The full-time official is in negotiations and comes out. He said, âRightâ to the women and men. âRight, we got a fiver, what do you think?â And everybody shouts âNo, no.â God almighty, right? He went back and said they will have another go with management. He comes back out. âWeâve got this final offer of ten pound, what do you think?â And everybody goes, âNo, no.â He said, âWhat the heck do you want?â A wee voice at the back says âSocialism.â He went, âThe management will never agree to that.â
So itâs that kind of limitation of trade unions â they only negotiate on your terms and conditions. But in these schools of struggle people can sharpen their experience and build dual power.
LH: Trade unions are the perfect âschools of warâ, but also bring real, material victories. What victories do you take from your organising in the 1970s?
You begin to see the world in a particular way when you see that itâs a class struggle
WB: If I had a mantelpiece, I would have a lot of second prizes on it. Occasionally a first prize, but in the struggle that is taken as read. We fought a great fight in the 1970s and won a lot. But mostly, there was a window when workersâ power wasnât questioned. Nobody could say that workers didnât have power because they could see on the telly.
They had a three-day working week imposed by the government to save electricity. There was a minersâ leader, Mick McGahey, who was the sidekick of Arthur Scargill during the minersâ strike. I remember hearing McGahey speak. He said, and I think Bob Crow stole the statement, âListen, if we all spit together we will drown the bastards.â Meaning that we are many, and they are few, but they control everything. Therefore, we have to wrestle and everyone knew it.
LH: We are currently seeing a huge resurgence of worker self-activity. What advice would you give to the organisers of today?
WB: Never give up. In 50 yearsâ time, who will they remember? They will remember Rosa Parks. They will remember Martin Luther King. You should be a troublemaker. Be a troublemaker, make a difference. Donât go through life looking at things that are bad and do nothing about it. So have courage and step up.
There will be consequences to that. Sometimes youâll be there on your own. But often enough people will recognise that kind of organic leadership, that leadership which stays close to its base, that doesnât climb the greasy pole, doesnât look to have an easier life as a full-time official. You have to work the overtime, you have to get up and do the night shift, you have to suffer the bossâs tongue and discipline. The closer you are to that, then at the time of the explosion, youâll be in the right position.
So itâs really important to be a troublemaker. A working-class hero is something to be, actually, so you have to step forward. And if youâve got youth on your side, then youâve got 40 years of struggle ahead.
This article first appeared in issue #237, Autumn 2022, Power in Unions. Subscribe today to get your magazine delivered hot off the press!
Source: Redpepper.org.uk