Over the past two months, it has become clear that Ukraineâs offensive, promoted relentlessly by the US media as a turning point in the war, has produced a bloody disaster.
Russian officials claim tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in the offensive, while Kiev does not even keep a public count. Ukraineâs armed forces have not achieved any meaningful breakthrough, and their territorial gains are almost impossible to see when viewed on a map of the entire country.
In response to this obvious debacle, the Biden administration and the Pentagon have publicly claimedâin the form of anonymous statements to the US mediaâthat the failure of the offensive has been due to the Ukrainian militaryâs unwillingness to carry out suicide charges.
In an article titled âUkraineâs Forces and Firepower Are Misallocated, U.S. Officials Say,â the New York Times reports complaints by the White House and Pentagon that Ukraine is âreturning to its old ways of wearing down Russian forces with artillery and long-range missiles instead of plunging into minefields under fire.â
It adds, âAmerican planners have advised Ukraine to concentrate on the front driving toward Melitopol, Kyivâs top priority, and on punching through Russian minefields and other defenses, even if the Ukrainians lose more soldiers and equipment in the process.â
In other words, US officials cited by the Times accuse Ukraine of reluctance to sacrifice the lives of its soldiers, under conditions in which hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian troops have already been killed.
In the Timesâ account, the US is urging Ukraine to focus all its forces on a massive charge against the heavily mined Russian lines, similar to the early weeks of the counteroffensive when such tactics resulted in catastrophic losses.
The Timesâ description of the dangers Ukrainian forces face is harrowing. âThe fighting is taking place on mostly flat, unforgiving terrain, which favors the defenders. The Russians are battling from concealed positions that Ukrainian soldiers often only notice when very close. Hours after Ukrainians clear a field of mines, the Russians sometimes fire another rocket, scattering more mines in the same location.â
The report concludes, âOnly with a change of tactics and a decisive move can the counteroffensiveâs pace change, said one U.S. official.â
Reflecting on the Times article, chairman of the WSWS international editorial board David North remarked on Twitter, âA clear indicator of the Ukrainian counter-offensiveâs disastrous failure is the blame game. The emerging narrative is that the Ukrainian regime didnât heed US advice. In truth, Ukraineâs misfortune stems from adhering strictly to US recommendations.â

The statements by US officials to the New York Times were reiterated in a Wall Street Journal article entitled âU.S., Ukraine Clash Over Counteroffensive Strategy,â which alleges that âWashington has expressed âserious frustrationâ with Ukraineâs strategy.â
One official lamented, âWe built up this mountain of steel for the counteroffensive. We can’t recreate it… Itâs gone.â
The Wall Street Journal reiterates the primary US grievance that the Ukrainian military is too cautious with its troopsâ lives.
âKeeping casualties low is necessary to maintain their long-term combat ability, the Ukrainians argue. However, U.S. officials believe the Ukrainiansâ limited attacks on small fronts hamper the offensive,â the Journal writes.
In an earlier article titled âUkrainian Troops Trained by the West Falter in Battleâ published on August 2, the Times elucidated the USâs motivations in calling for extensive rushes against fortified defensive positions.
The article reads, âThe Americans advocated âcombined arms tacticsâcoordinated attacks by infantry, armor, and artillery forces.â Western officials praised this method as more efficient than the expensive strategy of wearing down Russian forces through attrition, which could drain Ukraineâs ammunition supplies.â
In a perspective earlier this month, the World Socialist Web Site wrote,
Given the ammunition shortage, US officials have advocated frequent attacks on Russian trenches, leading to countless casualties. Evidently, American generals view Ukrainian lives as more expendable than ammunition.
Even as the US and NATO increasingly acknowledge the Ukrainian counteroffensiveâs futility, they are ramping up weapons deliveries to the country. On Thursday, the Pentagon confirmed it would commence F-16 fighter jet training for Ukrainian pilots in October.
Simultaneously, Norway announced Thursday its intention to dispatch its own F-16 fighters to Ukraine, joining the Netherlands and Denmark.
As the scale of the carnage becomes evident, the US media insists on an endless war in Ukraine. Earlier this week, the Washington Post published an editorial titled âWar in Ukraine has raged for 18 months. Prepare for more.â
Noting âNearly half a million casualties, including almost 200,000 dead,â the Post dismisses any peaceful settlement of the war. âNo end to the slaughter is foreseeable,â it declares.
The editorial ends, âThe conflict could persist for yearsâintensifying, subsiding, or stalling.â
In an op-ed in the same newspaper, General David Petraeus, who before the offensive asserted that a decisive breakthrough would occur within days, contends that the right response to the debacle is to intensify the conflict. âThe USâs provision of over $44 billion in arms, ammunition, and support has been commendable. But we must do more and with greater urgency. The time to act is now.â
Source: Wsws.org