Above photo: White House/public domain.
FOIA is just as fragile and in disrepair as it was when Biden was elected.
Editorâs Note:Â The following is the first in a series of articles on President Joe Bidenâs legacy when it comes to press freedom, whistleblowing, and government secrecy. The series will be published from now until January 2025.
President Joe Bidenâs administration promised a ârecommitment to the highest standards of transparency,â and officials were well aware of the extent to which Donald Trumpâs administration had engaged in censorship and undermined the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Despite promises, when it came to FOIA and the publicâs right to know, the Biden administration was just as bad or slightly worse than the Trump administration during its last fiscal year in office. In fiscal year 2023, United States government agencies censored, withheld, or claimed that they could not find any records two-thirds of the time.
According to Matthew Connelly, author of âThe Declassification Engine: What History Reveals About Americaâs Top Secrets,â the Biden administration did not give âpolicymaking in this area much more priorityâ than the Trump administration. âAfter his first year, advocacy groups were unable to find anyone in the White House who was even working on the issue.â
Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memorandum on FOIA in 2022 that directed âall executive branch departments and agencies to apply a presumption of opennessâ when it comes to FOIA. It also made clear that the Justice Department (DOJ) would not defend ânondisclosure decisionsâ when a department or agency failed to do so. Yet this was the empty pledge put forward by the DOJ for the past 15 years.
In 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder claimed the government would only defend a denial of a FOIA request in court if the agency reasonably foresaw that âdisclosure would harm an interest protected by one of the statutory exemptionsâ or if disclosure was âprohibited by law.â Officials under President Barack Obama still fought the release of the DOJâs Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) legal opinions and other records.
Similarly, in October 2024, the Biden DOJ appealed [PDF] a landmark decision that ordered [PDF] the government to proactively disclose OLC legal opinions as required by FOIAâs âreading-room provision.â
The Knight First Amendment Institute had pursued transparency because â[t]wenty years ago, legal contortions by OLC lawyers green-lighted torture and other gross human rights violations in Iraq, GuantĂĄnamo Bay, and secret CIA prisons.â Disclosure was necessary to discourage the OLC from acting as a âsecretive legal shop with the power to bend or distort the law for the White House or federal agencies.â
As a result of the Biden DOJâs resistance to openness, the second Trump administration will not have to worry about the public learning about any secret reinterpretations of the law that are pursued to bolster the imperial presidency.
Surveillance Secrecy, Censoring Guantanamo Prisonersâ Art
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the New York Times sued the Biden administration after it refused to disclose the ârules governing lethal strikes outside of recognized warzones.â Initially, not only did Biden officials ignore calls to release the rules, but according to Just Security, the administration would not even release a fact sheet for the governmentâs âdrone-strike playbookâ like Obama did.
Though the Senate Select Committee on Intelligenceâs report on CIA torture confirmed that the agency had âoperational controlâ over Camp VII at Guantanamo Bay, the Biden administration defended the CIA from having to confirm or deny whether it had further information about the agencyâs role at Guantanamo.
As the ACLU outlined, declassified documents as well as âdocuments and transcripts from the GuantĂĄnamo military commissions proceedingsâ were publicly available. Fighting this FOIA request in court represented a naked attempt to protect the CIA from facing further scorn for heinous acts that the agency committed in the global âwar on terrorism.â
The Pentagon ended a Trump policy that barred 41 prisoners at Guantanamo from taking their art if and when they were released. Buzzfeed reporter Jason Leopold fought for the disclosure of prisoner art, and in 2022, U.S. Southern Command finally released âphotographed copies of the artwork.â But hundreds of paintings were censored.
âWhen prisonersâ art could potentially disclose military secrets, weâre well through the looking glass,â the Electronic Frontier Foundation and MuckRock News declared.
A panel established by Congress that is known as the Public Interest Declassification Board recommended disclosure of the full intelligence report on journalist Jamal Khashoggi and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabiaâs involvement in his murder. However, Biden only released a redacted version of the report and the Biden DOJ fought a FOIA lawsuit to force greater transparency.
When the ACLU asked the U.S. Supreme Court to order the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to release all legal opinions containing novel or significant interpretations of the law, the Biden Justice Department defended the secret surveillance court. Officials insisted that the courts do not even have jurisdiction to consider whether citizensâ have a First Amendment right to access the surveillance courtâs legal opinions.
The Supreme Court sided with the administration and refused to hear the ACLUâs appeal. Justices Neil Gorsuch and Sonia Sotomayor dissented [PDF]. âThis case presents questions about the right of public access to Article III judicial proceedings of grave national importance,â and, âIf these matters are not worthy of our time, what is?â (Article III in the U.S. Constitution established the judicial branch.)
Hiding JFK Assassination Records, âVirtual Visitor Logsâ
In 2022, the Mary Ferrell Foundation sued Biden and the National Archives and Records Administration for failing to fulfill the requirements of the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act. The organization accused Biden of relying on flimsy claims of âanticipated harmâ to keep thousands of records hidden because decades later the CIA and other executive branch agencies still oppose their disclosure.
The Biden DOJ defended the Homeland Security Department (DHS) as NPR fought for thousands of pages of âconfidential inspection reportsâ detailing conditions in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities. The reports described âbarbaric practices, negligent medical care, racist abuse and filthy conditions.â
In 2022, the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia found that DHS had inappropriately invoked FOIA exemptions to hide âpurely factual informationâ and instructed DHS to re-process NPRâs request for records.
Before Amos Hochstein played a key role in helping the Biden administration support Israelâs ethnic cleansing campaign in Gaza, he was a Biden energy official. Friends of the Earth, an environmental organization, sued the State Department in 2022 and 2023 to obtain files on Hochstein.
âHochstein enjoyed a profitable run in the private sector that included consulting and speaking fees from fossil fuel interests and an executive position at LNG developer Tellurian,â Friends of the Earth (FOE) recalled. âSince the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Hochstein has assumed a leading role in the newly established US-EU Energy Security Task Force, whose mandate includes increasing LNG exports to Europe.â
FOE sought to uncover whether Hochstein was more engaged in fossil fuel lobbying than diplomacy. Eventually, some records were released, but the State Departmentâs refusal to comply with FOIA meant that the organization had no idea how many documents the department had on Hochstein and how long it would be before they received all the records responsive to their request.
Trump received widespread condemnation for hiding visitor logs from the press and public. Biden resumed the disclosure of visitor logs after he assumed office, but his administration carved a loophole in its commitment to openness by excluding âvirtual visitor logs.â
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as POLITICOÂ reported, virtual meetings were the âprimary mode of interactionâ for Biden during his first year in office. Lists of attendees were kept secret.
Open government groups urged Biden to âtake actionâ on âdisappearing messaging apps and mandate messaging apps capture communications used in official business.â Several Trump officials were known to have used Signal, which would make it difficult for agencies to abide by the Presidential Records Act and retain communication records. But the Biden administration did nothing meaningful to address this issue.
A âTsunamiâ Of Secrets
After the Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines called attention to government secrecy in January 2023, a group of U.S. senators  unveiled legislation that they claimed would significantly deal with government secrecy and reform the âclassification process.â It proposed designating the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) as the âexecutive agent for classification and declassification,â developing âtechnical solutionsâ for automatic declassification, and establishing an executive committee for the classification and declassification of records.
However, if adopted, this legislation almost certainly would have entrenched more decision-making power in the hands of the U.S. president and security agencies, who have consistently worked to thwart transparency on national security and military matters.
To further illustrate the absurdity of government secrecy, Haines sent a letter on overclassification to Democratic Senator Ron Wyden and Republican Senator Jerry Moran in January 2022. It had an attachment on âdeclassification effortsâ at U.S. intelligence agencies.
The version of the attachment [PDF] released to the public censored the amount of funds spent each year by the CIA, National Security Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the ODNI, which Haines oversaw.
Government officials, according to Matthew Connelly, spend around $18 billion a year to keep secrets. More specifically, the DOJ spends about $40 million a year on litigation to fight the release of records.
FOIA is plagued by systemic problems. Under Biden, the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) called attention to the âuptick in submitted FOIA requests, combined with the chronic underfunding of agency FOIA offices,â which âmeans that agency backlogs and processing delays continue to increase.â
âWhen agencies do respond to requests, FOIA exemptions meant to protect classified or otherwise legally sensitive information are often used to excessively withhold information that rightfully belongs to the public,â POGO added.
The Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) indicated in 2021 that agencies could âno longer keep [their] heads above the tsunami of digitally created classified records.â
Walter Shaub, who was the director of the Office of Government Ethics and worked as a fellow at POGO, warned after Trumpâs first term, âWeâve been through four years of having to battle tooth and nail to get any documents, and we need [Biden] to set up new systems so the next administration will follow them.â
No âsystemsâ for greater transparency were established, and issues with FOIA were not properly dealt with. As Trump returns to the White House, FOIA is just as fragile and in disrepair as it was when Biden was elected in 2020.
Source: Popularresistance.org






