On Sept. 26, 2022, a series of explosions rocked the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines in the Baltic Sea off the coast of Denmark. Danish and Swedish authorities quickly determined that the damage done to the pipelines was not caused by earthquakes or other seismic activity, but by “blasts.” The pipelines were a crucial part of Europe’s energy infrastructure, delivering billions of cubic meters of gas from Russia. Over 500,000 tons of methane, a greenhouse gas 80x more damaging for the climate than carbon dioxide, were released from the explosions in the largest ever recorded single methane leak in human history.
The question of how the Nord Stream leaks occurred—and who is responsible—went unanswered for months. The US and NATO have both described the events as acts of sabotage, and the Russian government has pointed the finger at the US. In Feb., veteran journalist and Pulitzer Prize-winner Seymour Hersh dropped a bombshell report detailing how President Joe Biden ordered the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines. The White House swiftly denounced Hersh’s report as “utterly false,” and ridicule soon followed in the corporate media. Seymour Hersh joins The Chris Hedges Report to explain his report, and why corporate media and the US government are so intent on dismissing him.
Production: Adam Coley, David Hebden, Cameron Granadino
Post-Production: Cameron Granadino
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.
On Monday, September 26th, 2022, a series of underwater explosions blew huge holes into the Nord Stream I and II, two pairs of pipelines constructed to carry Russian natural gas to Germany under the Baltic Sea. These four pipelines, steel reinforced concrete cables, built to withstand the direct impact of the anchor of an aircraft carrier were destroyed in a clandestine act of sabotage. According to an investigation by Pulitzer-prize winning reporter, Seymour Hersh. The pair of Nord Stream I pipelines carried Russian gas to Germany until Moscow cut off supplies at the end of August, 2022. The pair of Nord Stream II pipelines, which would’ve doubled the amount of gas that would be available to Germany and Western Europe, were never operational as Germany suspended its certification process shortly before Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24th, 2022. White House spokesperson, Adrian Watson, called Hersh’s report “false and complete fiction.” CIA spokesperson, Tammy Thorpe, said, “This claim is completely and utterly false. Denials by US officials of covert operations, of course, a routine.”
Secretary of State, Dean Rusk, for example, denied any US involvement in the Bay of Pigs invasion in Cuba, assuring the American people that the invasion was not “staged from American soil.” When Seymour Hersh in 2004 published the first stories about the torture of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib, a Pentagon spokesperson called his reporting “a tapestry of nonsense.” Adding that Hersh was a guy who “threw a lot of crap against the wall and expects someone to peel off what’s real.” Despite the denials, the United States has long expressed hostility to the pipelines. It worked to prevent the completion of the pipelines and imposed illegal sanctions on enterprises engaged in its construction. President Biden on February 7th, 2022, prior to the invasion of Ukraine by Russia stated, “If Russia invades there will be no longer a Nord Stream II. We will bring an end to it.”
During a Senate hearing, Victoria Nuland under Secretary of State for political affairs was asked by Senator Ted Cruz whether his legislation aimed at sanctioning the Nord Stream II gas pipeline, which was voted down in January of 2022, could have stopped the war. “Like you, I am, and I think the administration is very gratified to know that Nord Stream II is now, as you like to say, a hunk of metal at the bottom of the sea,” Nuland said. US Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken, described the destruction of the pipelines as a “Nuland opportunity which would enable EU countries to become less dependent on Russian energy.” The New York Times reported in December that Russia had begun expensive repairs on the pipelines, raising questions about Washington’s claim that Russia had bombed its own infrastructure. These explosions are not insignificant acts. They are acts of war. They expose not only the collapse of the rule of law, but the lack of oversight by Congress.
I covered the mining of Nicaragua’s Harbors in 1983 by the Reagan administration as a reporter in Central America. The mining was designed to cripple the economy in Nicaragua and boost the fortunes of the US back contra rebels seeking to overthrow the [inaudible 00:03:56] in Eastern government in Nicaragua. The mining backfired. It sparked outrage around the globe and saw Congress cut off funding for the [inaudible 00:04:06] a year later. The International Court of Justice in 1986 ruled against the United States over its mining of the harbors. Hersh’s revelations should have led to a similar condemnation by Congress and an internal investigation into illegal activities by the CIA and the Pentagon. It should have prompted news organizations to dig deeper into a scandal, a flagrant violation of the UN Charter and international treaties. It should have prompted a national debate about the war in Ukraine and the steady escalation of our involvement, one that could lead to a direct confrontation with Russia and possibly nuclear war.
Joining me to discuss his latest investigative piece is Seymour Hersh, one of our most important and fearless investigative reporters who, among many groundbreaking stories, exposed the US Army’s 1969 Mỹ Lai Massacre and coverup, the Watergate scandal, the secret bombing of Cambodia, the torture by US soldiers at Abu Ghraib of Iraqi prisoners and the false narrative told by the US government about the events surrounding the killing of Osama bin Laden. So Sy, let’s talk about why the US destroyed the pipelines and in your story you write that they began preparing the destruction of the pipelines two months before the Russian invasion of Ukraine. And then if you can also explain why they saw the pipelines as a threat.
Well, you’re getting to the core of it and actually if you wonder why people on the inside might have talked to me about this is because of their disillusionment with what the Obama administration did. The initial plan to was the initial idea of a covert team, the set-up to look at the … had nothing. The initial team was set up only to give options and that was before Christmas of 2021. We were three months away or two and a half months away from the invasion. But the Russian, Putin, et cetera, was already moving forces into Belarus. So something was on and the idea was Jake Sullivan convene a group usual CIA, NSA State Department, Treasury Department, joint chiefs of staff, a small group meeting at a very secret place they have in the executive office building. And I did mention specifics there because I wanted people to know that I knew specifics because I knew there would be resistance to the story I was writing, which I didn’t learn about till after the bombing took place last September.
At that time it was just a question of the word of art. The language of was very specific language they were told to discuss kinetic or the way it was actually put was we want reversible and irreversible options. That was the literal, the artful language used and the reversible options would be more sanctions, et cetera, et cetera. And as ask Cuba about sanctions. They’ve been sanctioned since ’61. Yeah. And the sanctions as they didn’t work out in Russia too, the current one and the irreversible would be something kinetic. So within a couple of weeks it was clear the people who advocated for us won the game and they were thinking of military options and they had all sorts of crazy options. We had learned in the Vietnam War. We mine [inaudible 00:07:45] Harbor by dropping mines from a bomb with timers on them from airplanes. It’s amazing the state of art of mine warfares growing up enormously.
And so the option was blow up the pipeline. That’s the one option you can give. And they told the White House, I would guess, I don’t know specifics, but certainly by mid-January they were saying, “Okay, it’s possible,” because people there knew of the capability. We had a very superior school in, down in panhandle of Florida somewhere in near something called Panama City. There was a big Navy school for divers and navy divers, not SEALS. They were navy trained divers. And they had been skilled in the art of blowing up an oil rig. We might not like good and the bad, they could also clear harbors, but they were experts and we knew we had the experts, a good bomb could mine anything, even a pipeline. But how to do it wasn’t clear, but they told the White House in January, they had made a connection with Norway.
The Norwegian Navy goes back to the Vietnam War with us, really. I’ve written about that as you probably know. They go back to the provocation that led to the Gulf of Tonkin resolution led to this whole horrible war. There’s an analogy I’m writing about it because we’re in an analogous situation with the Lyndon Johnson having the right by lying and doing something deceitful, pretending that North Vietnam had blown, attacked that American destroyer, which it had not, and put us into a war that as we like to say, killed between two and three Vietnamese as if between one million or two million isn’t such a big deal. Anyway, whatever racist intonation you want to give it, it’s there. And in this case, so they came up with an option. It was all a terribly secret program that they were doing with, they were working with the Norwegians that’s never been made public. And until actually as I mentioned, I wrote about in another subseq piece and the extent to which, no worries, in our pocket and on this stuff. And so-
Let me ask why-
Let me just finish the thought. The issue is initially it was just going to be a threat that Putin and the hostility from Putin had been growing with America. Americans respond to presidents yipping and yapping about a bad guy and Putin was a dead letter man in America right now. Right now you can’t talk about him in any rational way. But the question was once they told the White House that both the president and the undersecretary for political affairs, whatever her name is.
Victoria Nuland, whose husband is one of the original-
Yeah, Kagan, who’s one of the guys that thought the solution to Al-Qaeda bombing us in the 9/11 was to radical hating Saddam. Anyway, whatever the worst mistake probably made in modern history, even worse probably in long term, maybe worse than Vietnam because of the consequences that we still are looking at. Anyway, the only point was that their idea was to construct a mechanism to put back down Putin. We’re going to destroy the second pipeline. The first pipeline, there were two. The first one which went into business in 9/11 supplying Europe with gas, cheap gas, a lot of it was cut back was stopped by Putin himself in 2021 or ’20 just because of the language we were using.
The second one was stopped by us. It was the new pipeline. Nord Stream II had been finished in 2020 or ’21 and had been sanctioned by Germany. So we had a pipeline that could have been opened by the Germans but had been sanctioned. And so Biden gives the order to bomb and it’s destroyed on September the 26th months after the … and these guys had, I don’t know whether they were, had just backed off when he, I don’t know whether they had to go back and put everything online, but they thought it was a dead letter issue. So he does it and on his command, that’s what people in the CI do, they respond to the crown and not to the constitution. Something I mentioned that the first story and with a sense of doom and he blew it up. And so I’ve done a lot of thinking, a lot of reporting on what was going on in late September that would’ve changed the equation by blowing up the German pipeline.
He was saying there’s no natural gas or oil in West Europe. And there’s been a constant worry going back to the Kennedy days about Russian and their great reservoir of national gas and oil, weaponizing gas to maintain good relationships with Germany. We never liked that. We never lived the fact that that Germany was so dependent on Russian and Western Europe, on Russian fuel. That always bothered us, particularly Cheney, Cheney worried about it. Condoleezza Rice spoke often about it in the Bush Cheney years, Biden, when he was vice president chair committee that continued, this is not a new idea trying to remove the … it’s not a new idea to remove this link that would give the Russian some power inside Europe. That was always a nagging issue for us in the Cold War, the world of containment and this whole facade of containment that we think has worked but has not.
Anyway, that’s another story. And so what happened is, and the best I can get and the people I talk to, obviously I’m longer tooth here in Washington and so I know a lot of people and in the whole intelligence picture I’m seeing particularly by late September is so different than what’s been written in the Times, the Washington Times and the Washington Post. It’s like it’s another world. They’re so dependent on the paper, on briefings from, I guess from the Biden people. I don’t know where they’re getting the stuff they published, but by late September there had been a wonderful alleged victory when the Russians retreated and the Ukrainians ran across dozens of miles of territory. But I will tell you that by late September, at the best, it was going to be a very dark stalemate with no victory possible and Zelensky not willing to negotiate.
He had backed off and he was in his own little world of total corruption, the corruption of Ukraine. I mean, it’s so bad that the worry we’ve had in the community is that he was in trouble the generals because he was taking too much of the swag, his cut was too big. I’m serious. So I’m in that level of information that is really good and I know it’s real and meanwhile the papers are talking about whatever they’re talking, but sometimes those a hint of darkness. So in September, I think I will give you what I believe is the rationale for what he did, which is he wanted to prevent Germany, which has always, right now, there was, in case you care, there were two large marches in Berlin last weekend. One, the police said 15,000 or 13,000. And the newspaper people and the people running the protest was much closer than 50,000.
Tremendous amount against the war, not about the pipeline. So against giving more to this war because of the danger it posed. They did a marching Saturday and Sunday they went to the largest American base in near Berlin Manheim and surrounded it and also protested. And apparently on one in some embassy, I don’t remember whether it was ours or not, they had a destroyed Russian tank on display and they took down with the display and they put flowers and peace signs on it over that weekend.
Not a word in the Western press, not a word in the New York Times. It was a big story in the media in Europe and certainly even in London had good stories on it. Not a word here. It’s like there’s some sort of nimbus, a dark cloud over us. Anyway, so I think, I mean, the best guess you have, and I would guess 90% this is good, is that Biden move frightened, that if he saw Long War coming Germany, which was the reluctant to re-arm after World War II, after all, they spent a decade murdering, raping and killing in Western Europe among other places they’re allies now they’re all in NATO.
So I think what he did is he told NATO and he told Western Europe and he told Germany, “We no longer have your back. We’ve always had your back. We no longer have it. You can’t count on us anymore because this president thinks his war in Ukraine is more important than giving you the German government, the ability, not this winter, but next winter is going to be a tough one, the ability to keep the factories going and people warm.” Now, right now in Germany, the price of electricity is still rational and the government is subsidizing up to 20% in some places more so people that, particularly in larger cities and the corporations, but the largest corporation in the chemical company in the world just cut back production. It’s been talking to China about moving some facilities there because they can’t predict.
They don’t have a predictor. The gas that Russia was pumping in Nord Stream I was cheap and plentiful and so much that the German corporations that handled the gas were selling it downstream and making a profit about which Russia did care not. The pipeline Nord Stream I, which was such a boon to the European economy was owned 51% by Gazprom, oligarchs who kicked back the great deal of money to Russia. To give you some idea how much money that was being produced for Russia and for gas being one, one year 45 billion was funneled into the Russian economy by Gazprom. 49% of it, the company was owned by stockholders, was owned by four European countries that sold the cheap gas downstream. So it was a big operation and they lost Nord Stream I, Nord Stream II was going to pick it back up so that Biden did this, what some people call an act of war, at least the people involved think it was an act of war who did the planning for it because he no longer trusted West Europe to support him and his adventure in Ukraine, which I think the only thing he can think is that presidents in wars always are popular.
A war is sustained presidents. We’ve seen that historically that they go … Bill Clinton came into office with one, don’t tell, don’t … with the attitude allowing gaze in the military, there was tremendous resistant and he was in the first couple of months were just a disaster. He probably should have fired some of the members of the joint chief who were openly critical of him. But he didn’t do that. He waffled, but in May, I think it was, he authorized the bombing of Baghdad. The first time the Americans have ever, we’ve ever bombed a major capital in the Middle East. And killed eight people which I remember one official tell me only eight. And I said to him, “What if one of them was your …” His son played in a ball team with mine. That’s how I knew Sandy Berger.
Sandy was deputy national security advise. I came in there with do a story about what they did and he said, “What are you worrying about? They’re only eight.” And I said, “One of them was one, your son that played third base with my kid, my kid’s baseball team.” And he said, “Get out of this office.” Literally, no Republican never done that to me, even in the Bush, even though in the Clinton, in the days of Watergate, nobody. There’s always a manner of polite. He said, “Get out of my office,” somebody I’d known for 20 years. And so Biden does the bombing, I mean, Clinton, and the next day was a Saturday and on Sunday I’m watching, he goes to church and he’s followed by cameras going to church. It was his best day in the White House. He’d actually bombed and kill people and that was his best day. And I remember that stuck in my mind forever. So that’s where we’re at with this presidency we have right now, the best day. He thinks it’s going to come when he wins in whatever his fantasy is about Ukraine, it is terrifying.
But he’s losing the war. They’re losing the war, the Russians.
Well, I don’t know if … I think if you watch the Times and Post, like I do, I think it’s beginning to back off, but they still run nothing. I love the stories about Russians raping and brutality. Is there an army that doesn’t rape and brutalize? Are you kidding? What happens when a Russian soldier is captured by the Ukrainians? They’re given blankets and hot coffee.
Well, or those, the Ukrainians argue are collaborators. What happens to them?
Well, you’re talking about that famous story about that first village.
And where the reporters were taken by … They never mentioned that they were taken by representatives of the Ukrainian government to this village. Yes. My understanding, I haven’t written this because I followed the war, but I haven’t been writing about it. During the COVID days, I’ve been doing a big project on containment going back to China in ’54. I mean, it’s fascinating how dumb we are and have been all along with our anti-communist stuff. But anyway, I’m back in Vietnam too a lot. But they’re armbands. They were just hell. They put armbands around certain people and there was a lot of reporting in the European press, not here, that many of the people who were executed so badly had been accused of being Russian supporters or collaborators by the Ukrainians.
So they were killed and not necessarily by the retreating Russian troops, but I assure you there are abuses by troops everywhere. I mean, rapists, that’s one of the virtues of being a soldier in every war. Don’t think we’re any better than anybody else. We know we’re not. I mean, Eli told me that I went light on the sex stuff at Eli. When I wrote my stories, I didn’t want every South Vietnamese soldier to wake up after reading what really happened and getting is the revolver and going hunting down that American soldier. I was worried about that. The war was still on. Soldiers do awful things.
Yeah, yeah, I know. And both sides lie like they breathe. I want to ask about the Navy’s Diving and Salvage Center, which you mentioned because as you said, it’s not part of America’s special operations command, but it was selected for a reason, not solely because of its expertise, but because as you write in your story, it allowed the administration not to brief Congress.
Well, when you’re working with the CIA and the NSA on secret operations, there is a law you have to do. The CIA in particular has to do a finding that has to be presented to Congress. Basically it’s to a clerk on a subcommittee of appropriations that only has four members on it. I mean, it’s a very, still a very contained operation, but it has to be briefed. And you also have to brief the Gang of Eight, which is what they call the House and Senate leaders of both parties and the House and Senate members of the Intelligence Committee. And there hasn’t been any collaboration or any good feelings between the two of them since Trump got in. I mean, are you kidding? And would you think about if you’re Biden and you want to run a down and dirty program, you want to, do you want a brief speaker McCarthy about it?
I don’t think so, but whatever case is once the reason they pick the divers who are skilled, it’s a school. You pick people that have been trained by them. By the way, the whole trick of an operation, this is very few, you only needed two divers, but you had to pick good ones who not necessarily were at the school, but they’ve been trained by the school and have been in the field doing good and bad as I wrote anyway, once you don’t go to the Navy Seals because they’re in the special operations command and that requires a finding. So look, this is all just word games because I wrote a lot for the New Yorker after, when Bush and Cheney were in running ops, they never briefed anything to the Congress. They just said, “Screw this law, who cares?” But under Biden, it was very convenient to say, once Biden spoke out about the operation and once you only had people there who were from the Navy doing the diving, not SEALS.
And once you actually had, even if somebody you actually had, you hadn’t told the joint chiefs much about this because they have to respect certain laws, you can decide it’s no longer a covert operation, it’s now a classified operation. And under rulings they have, the CIA can bring in an army unit, a military unit into an operation that’s classified without briefing Congress. That’s just all games and words. But that is so, that’s what they did. In a way, Biden’s shooting off his mouth, Biden in February after they gave him a briefing, went public and was asked about, he was trying to stop Russia. We can stop Nord Stream II. We know we can and we will when we can. That kind of language was used. By the way, not one reporter has asked the White House about that since those early expressions, not one reporter. They just don’t do it.
And it was interesting to me that four days, I didn’t know anything about this. Then I was just following it four days after the September 26th bombing, which I do think was aimed at keeping Europe away from being tied to Russia because of this long-standing worry about the Russian weaponization is the word we used. Four days later, Jake Sullivan, who had convened the initial meeting, had a news conference. He was asked, not right away, I was amazed, not till 11 minutes, I looked at the tape, was he asked about the bombing under the sea and he said, “Yes.” He said … I don’t know what they’re feeding the press corps today, but the question was asked in such a way, do you think Russians did it? What? As somebody said to me about the story I wrote, a friend of mine is much smarter than I am.
Given that the Nuland and Biden had both in January and February, talked about the possibility of Dewey once they learned it was possible from the secret world, which was really an upsetting to the guys in the secret world doing it. Once they said that anyway, you’d think somebody would ask that question, but instead the first question asked was, “Do you think the Russians did it?” And Sullivan, who had convened the meeting knowing exactly what happened, his answer was, “I love this.” He said, “Well, it’s like that because they’re immediately accusing us and denying.” So that seems to be the way the Russians operate. But I will tell you, the Janes and the Swedes are doing an investigation and I said, “Let’s wait and see until it happens.” So a month later, the Danes and Suite in October 16th, I think I didn’t even mention this in the article. It’s too stupid to be believed.
They announced that they just studied the event for weeks and weeks and they concluded there was an indeed an underwater explosion. That was their study. And so here’s the question I’ve asked. Here’s the question that the next time there’s a news conference I saw asked, “Please, please, some reporter ask this question.” Well, Mr. President, you’re the president and you have the right, absolute right to demand is called, there’s a two, the word of Hartford that skips my mind. He can make a request, he can ask the head of intelligence, the Office of National Intelligence has an intelligence. They’re the top the dogs. It’s called The Head of National Intelligence runs all the community and he can ask them, he can compel him to do a study what happened and who did the bombing. And he can also ask the CIA has an office called the Director of Intelligence along with operations and science and technology, which produces a lot of good stuff.
There are a lot of bright guys working there. You can ask them to do a study and if the CIA, when it has people in the field like they did in Norway as a team, I used to be called the C team. It’s all very secret. I’m sure they change everything every week, but there has a team there that does the monitoring. If we have a team abroad, they monitor like local phone calls, everything to make sure nobody’s figured out there’s something ongoing on a very high intense operation, make a study. He’s never asked anybody to do anything. Why don’t you ask if he’s at … Just ask. And the answer will be, of course they haven’t because they know the answer. I mean, this is such a dumb lie they’re into and they’re going to just lie the rest of the way because there’s why not?
Let’s talk about the reaction. Let’s talk about the reaction and in particular the reaction of news organizations. As you, when you and I worked at the Times, if somebody Washington Post broke a major story, we had to dig to find out whether we could match it. If we couldn’t match it, we had to acknowledge that the Post ran it. The Times hated doing that. But this reaction is frightening. I’m sure you find, I find it frightening, but I’ll let you take it from there. I mean, I find it kind of staggering.
Well, the problem with … You’re right. In the early days, I’ll tell you something else we did when I was at the Times, everybody screws up the story. I screwed up a story about a certain ambassador during the Chile crisis, and he was a friend of the paper and Abe Rosenthal. The editor had visited him. He was the ambassador. Ed Corey was the ambassador to Ethiopia at the time, and he had been in Chile and he had been involved in, there were two aspects to the Chilean operation we did to get at a [inaudible 00:31:28]. I mean, the idea that a [inaudible 00:31:33] death was a suicide is not possible for me to believe. After [inaudible 00:31:38], but there were two levels. There was a propaganda level that the ambassador ran ranting about him and calling him out. And then there was this secret level of actually paying people to kill people that he was not cut in because he wasn’t trusted by the station because he was sort of a motor mouth Ed Corey.
And so as a reporter, when I wrote the story, the first story about Chile and the CI involvement and Kissinger was angry and all that stuff. He was involved and there was a senate committee led by Frank Church who later read, investigated another story. I did the church committee after domestic spying, and he started, he put out a committee, put out a report, and I, like 50 other reporters, I was following the story, wrote a piece for the New York Times about the Senate Committee said this and that about this chili stuff. And Corey, I mentioned, they had mentioned Corey as being involved in the actual more aggressively than just propaganda. And he of course went nuts about it. And even though I had done the same thing others did, he focused on me and he was right. I later learned that he was cut out.
I later learned that he was cut out of anything involved, the killing stuff because they didn’t trust the ambassador, which happens. And so I wrote was then working on a book on a Kissinger and it was ’81. I’d been out of the paper for a couple years and I told Abe, “Well, you know what? We screwed this guy over in on page one,” even though I wrote the report, six other eight other people did, but still I wrote it and New York Times was the New York Times, and so we did a front page correction. I wrote a 3000 word, not only correcting that, he wasn’t in it, but describing why he wasn’t in it. I was as a way to write another story about what really happened, and we put it on page one and the response to the peers was pretty much ignoring this sort of exceptional thing that I wrote a 3000 story saying I screwed up stuff, but there was a reason for it, which was made better.
The Time Magazine, they did a ridicule piece, the 3000 word oops, right? They’d run the same story I did earlier, a couple years earlier on the Senate committee, and so Abe Rosenthal said to me, I’ll never forget it, he said, “I’m never going to show,” he used a vulgar word for rear end. He said, “I’m never going to show my ass to those guys again. Screw them all. I’m done. No more corrections if this is the way they behave.” I spent a month doing it. I’m sure I got paid minimal money. It wasn’t about money. I wasn’t on the staff.
I saw that. You’re right. Even as though then The Times covered things that they didn’t report it. It was of note, but I would say that’s disappeared totally long before I wrote stuff. I mean, when I was doing stuff for the New Yorker after 9/11, I was doing a lot of stories because I have access all with unnamed sources, but of course the New Yorker knows the sources and the people. By the way, I’m working with New Yorker Checkers right now, and an editor who used to be was my editor on London Review books when I wrote a bunch of stuff for them, and so they stopped chasing stories back then in, I thought after 9/11, I had a wonderful friend of mine that was on the paper call me and said, “Well, we all were called in Sunday about this story and we called everybody, we can’t match it, so we’re going to forget it.”
I said, “What?” He said, “I know it’s crazy, but they’re not going to do it.” So it’s just an old values change and it changed. Then right now what they’re doing is they’re putting America in jeopardy. I mean, that’s a serious charge to make. The Times has a special obligation. It’s stature and it still has the staff. The print circulation is way down, as you probably know, down to 330,000, it was 1.7 million. But they’re doing great. They have an online reading. I still get the paper. I’m old-fashioned. My wife’s been reading it online since it started because it’s easier for her.
I still get the print and I like to feel it and I like to read it that way, but it’s got an obligation to, the one fight I had with Rosenthal when I worked there that was never resolved, wasn’t about the papers instinctive anti-communism. It was about the fact that they weren’t an American newspaper. None of this American exceptionalism, they’re an international newspaper and they shouldn’t cover things from the American point of view as they do. That was a big fight I had. Just an intellectual fight that you’re making a mistake. You’re bigger than that. You got to start covering the story from a world point of view. And they didn’t. He thought I was nuts.
Well, I’m just going to stop there for a minute, but I mean, Abe Rosenthal very problematic figure. I mean, those were the glory days. It’s so diminished in terms of its integrity, its ethics, and the quality of its journalism, whether Jeff Gerth, of course, is great piece. We did an interview with Jeff on the Russia Trump saga, two years, four years of slogging, what was salacious gossip as news, the Caliphate podcast, all that kind of stuff. I want to thank the Real News Network and its production team, Cameron Granadino, Adam Coley, David Hebden, and Kayla Rivara. You can find me at chrishedges.substack.com. That was Seymour Hersh, you can also find at Substack.