
This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on Jan. 16, 2023. It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license.
Republican Rep. Rick Allen of Georgia suggested last week that he would support raising the Social Security retirement ageâa policy change that would slash benefits across the boardâbecause people have approached him and said they âactually want to work longer.â
Confronted by an advocate in the Capitol Building and asked how the GOP plans to cut Social Security, the congressman responded, âWeâre not going to cut Social Security.â
But seconds later, Allen contradicted himself by expressing support for raising the retirement age, saying the move would âsolve every one of these problemsâânot specifying what the âproblemsâ are from his perspective.
Watch:
Allen is a member of the Republican Study Committee, a House GOP panel that released a policy agenda last year calling for gradually raising the âfull retirement ageâ from 67 to 70, partially privatizing the New Deal program, and mean-testing benefits.
As Matt Bruenig of the Peopleâs Policy Project, a left-wing think tank, has explained, raising the Social Security retirement age is âjust a straightforward benefit reduction being expressed in an opaque way.â
âSocial Security does not have one retirement age. It has 96 retirement ages, one for each month between age 62 and 70,â Bruenig wrote in October. âWhat people call the âfull retirement ageâ (FRA) is just a placeholder in a formula that determines the benefit level at all 96 retirement ages.â
âWhen someone proposes increasing the retirement age to 68,â he continued, âall they are really proposing is to cut monthly Social Security benefits by around 7% at all 96 retirement ages. A proposal to raise the retirement age to 70 is just a proposal to cut monthly benefits by around 23% at all 96 retirement ages.â
House Republicans have repeatedly signaled in recent months that they will exploit every point of leverage they haveâincluding a fast-approaching showdown over the debt ceilingâto pursue long-sought cuts to Social Security under the guise of âsavingâ the program from a non-existent financial crisis.
During a House Republican conference meeting last week, a slide presentation indicated that the GOP intends to use its narrow majority in the lower chamber to push for âreformsâ to âmandatory spending programsââa category that includes Social Security and Medicare.
âRepublicans want you to work until you die,â the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works tweeted Sunday. âShameful.â
Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, wrote in an op-ed for The Hill last week that âAmericaâs seniors cannot afford benefit cuts, including raising the eligibility ages for future Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries.â
âOf course, the public is not demanding that Social Security and Medicare be cut. Quite the opposite: both programs remain overwhelmingly popular. A large majority of voters (83 percent) across party lines say they want to see Social Security expanded, not slashed, with the wealthy contributing their fair share in payroll taxes,â Richtman continued. âNevertheless, McCarthy has empowered a handful of ultra-MAGA members to dictate policy for the new House majority.â
Source: Therealnews.com