February 2, 2023
From Dissident Voice

by J.B. Gerald / February 2nd, 2023

Graphic by Julie Maas
The Williams Lake First Nation of British Columbia has announced discovery of another 66 sites which are possibly the graves of children on land of the St. Joseph Mission Residential School which closed in 1981. 93 suspected burial sites were previously announced. Control of the school passed from the Catholic Mission to the federal government in 1969. Approximately two thousand ‚Äúanomalies‚ÄĚ or possible graves have been detected by earth scanning instruments. Historical records indicated the deaths of only sixteen of the attending children. Geophysical analysis has been applied to 34 hectares so far of the 782 hectares to be assessed.

In response to a class action suit brought by 325 First Nations, the Trudeau government (awaiting court approval) has awarded a 2.8 billion dollar settlement, for a Trust which will attempt to repair damages caused by residential schooling. Funding to recompense individual damages was previously provided under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, approved by all parties in 2006 and Canada‚Äôs courts in 2007, costing the government $1.9 billion. An additional 27 million dollars was provided in 2021 to investigate unmarked graves.

There‚Äôs still a problem with this way of proceeding with historical crimes that have contravened the Convention on Genocide. Paying off damaged survivors of a genocide without addressing through the law the atrocities committed, suggests pay-offs as a business expense for the worst crimes known to humankind. But genocide isn‚Äôt simply an intentional crime ‚ÄĒ in this case, against Indigenous people ‚ÄĒ it‚Äôs a crime against society. Since this is a crime against humanity, such acts must be applied by a society under its legal system. [Whose legal system? The law of the First peoples or colonial law? ‚ÄĒ DV ed] Most of those directly responsible for the crimes of residential schools have passed away.

The challenge of a future ‚ÄĒ which will not be at the service of these crimes of the past or allow further crimes to protect the established colonial cultures ‚ÄĒ might be to identify and adjudicate the actual crimes committed, both under domestic law and the Convention on Genocide which has no statute of limitations. Does it seem ridiculous to apply the full force of international law to clerics and government administrators who facilitated the crimes of residential schooling? This possibility is rigorously avoided by the government, Canada‚Äôs left wing and right wing, and all Canadian media and alternative media.

If genocide is not confronted under law, there is little to discourage its continuation. Nightslantern.ca has noted about 50 informal genocide warnings for Indigenous peoples in Canada since 2005. To note one recent specific case: the Sipekne‚Äôkatik First Nation.

In 2020, attempts were made to shut down the independent lobstering of the Sipekne‚Äôkatik. The Nation‚Äôs boats were harassed on the water, one burned at the dock, and gear was stolen. Then a warehouse of Sipekne‚Äôkatik‚Äôs harvest was burned to the ground by a mob of commercial fishermen, and the Indigenous people threatened, all in front of police and Department of Fisheries and Oceans personnel who were continually monitoring the First Nation for fisheries infractions. Terrorized by the crimes and threats against their people the community appealed to police and the provincial and federal governments for help. The appeals were minimally answered, leaving the First Nation community under threat for its safety.

These crimes, the terrorization of the community, the damages to the community’s fleet and gear, furthered commercial fishing interests in Nova Scotia, and furthered control of a lucrative and powerful billion-dollar lobstering industry.

Increasingly, the Canadian media portrayed lobstering by the Sipekne‚Äôkatik as illegal, in this way supporting commercial interests which in turn were supported by the actions of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. The DFO, police, and Coast Guard continued to confiscate the First Nation‚Äôs fishing gear, lobster traps and catch, as if these were illegal. The Sipekne‚Äôkatik lobstering effort was an independent Indigenous fishery allowed by the Supreme Court Marshall decision in 1999 which however was followed by an unsettled legal ambivalence. The government has relied on this ambivalence to assert its control of Indigenous business, i.e., the commercial season, the amounts of catch, etc. (This is familiar ‚ÄėIndian management‚Äô policy from the 1800s on the prairies when a First Nation‚Äôs food production was limited to consumption and its farmers were not allowed sell their produce).

Without protection of its legal rights to fish, without protection for the safety of its community from corporate interests and those relying on payment from commercial fishing, the Sipekne‚Äôkatik First Nation had no recourse for its protection. The First Nation‚Äôs response was to register a complaint with the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD). The Government of Canada was legally bound to answer by July 14, 2021 but failed to comply with the request until March 14, 2022, and its explanation wasn‚Äôt released to the public. The Sipekne‚Äôkatik First Nation limited lobstering to harvesting a ‚Äúmoderate livelihood‚ÄĚ (a food, social ceremonial FSC license) which doesn‚Äôt allow commercial sale of the harvest.

Then in August of 2021, the self regulated Sipekne‚Äôkatik treaty fishery opened its season, without DFO approval. Chief Michael Sacks saw lobstering as an attempt to lift his community out of poverty. He was arrested by fisheries officers, then released and hassled. His gear was confiscated. The First Nation‚Äôs gear and traps were taken. In the past two years, 7000 of the Sipekne‚Äôkatik‚Äôs lobster traps were sabotaged, or confiscated by Canada‚Äôs DFO without clear legal justification. On January 9, Nova Scotia Judge Tim Landry, threw out the arrests of three Sipekne‚Äôkatik fishermen because the government prosecution hadn‚Äôt established a legal basis for their prosecution.

Chief Sacks has since been replaced by the community‚Äôs first woman chief, Michelle Glasgow. Last Spring the federal government gave the Sipekne‚Äôkatik First Nation $326,700 for research on the site of the Maritimes residential school, Shubenacadie. The residential school processed Indigenous students from 1930 to 1967 with funding by the federal government and management by the Catholic Church. Official histories of the school are usually accompanied by trauma warnings. Despite testimony to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission by school survivors, no unmarked Indigenous graves have yet been identified.

Time passing mutes the community’s fear, and ignores the commercial fishermen’s quandary of having to support company interests, the source of their livelihoods, against the human and legal rights of the Indigenous people. The federal government is paying the Sipekne’katik community which is the second largest Mi’kmaq band in Nova Scotia, an allocation of 2.73 million dollars toward 20 housing units for some of the cmmunity’s homeless, as part of a larger initiative to create housing across the North. The government is aware of the community’s poverty in a lethal climate, yet deprives the Sipekne’katik’s industry a living. The pay off coincides with the deprivation of what were once legally assured Indigenous rights.

These rights are recognized by Canada‚Äôs Senate. In July 2022, a Senate report asked the Federal government a) to let the Mi‚Äôkmaq independent fishery move forward under its own rights, and b) for obvious reasons to transfer negotiations with the Indigenous fisheries from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, to Crown-Indigenous Relations. The Senate report affirmed the rights of the Indigenous nations to at least co-manage the fisheries, currently crippled by DOF laws and control. And the Senate report affirmed the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

There is a continual struggle within the national fabric of Canada, within the federal government, about righting the course of history toward the hope for justice. Consider Dr. Peter Henderson Bryce‚Äôs report in 1907 on the lethal health conditions of Residential Schools and his The Story of a National Crime: Being a Record of the Health Conditions of the Indians of Canada from 1904 to 1921 in 1922. Or the sound efforts of the 1996 Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, and the reluctant but gradual acceptance of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People. Against the good sense of the Senate report is a deeply entrenched network of privilege and profit serving corporate wealth, with no concern for the survival of any peoples.

The Senate report and the Sipekne‚Äôkatik First Nation deserve the support of genocide prevention organizations such the Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies (MIGS), but with government funds MIGS hasn‚Äôt to my knowledge addressed any crimes against North America‚Äôs Indigenous peoples. It does properly address the WWII Holocaust, issues affecting Rwanda, and many other areas prone to violations of human rights. Domestic considerations of genocide are dealt with more directly by former European colonies in South America. In Brazil, former President Bolsonaro is under investigation for genocide in his treatment of the Yanomami Indians. In Peru sitting President Boluarte and at east five of her Ministers and former Ministers are under criminal investigation for allegations of genocide among other crimes, as a result of the murder by authorities of largely Indigenous and Mestizo worker-protesters. Here in Canada it‚Äôs an ongoing tension, eased by the sincere good intentions of so many Canadians, betrayed by political subservience to corporate profit.

Source: Dissidentvoice.org