On the St Mungo’s picket line at Guildford Street in south London
St Mungoâs homelessness workersâ indefinite strike came to an end on Friday after the Unite union pushed through a deal that falls far short of what strikers were fighting for. Â
They should be proud of their fight. Every penny extracted out of bosses is down to the indefinite strike, not union officialsâ negotiation skills. The noisy, carnival-like rallies outside donor, trustee and scab agency offices took the dispute onto the streets and outed their rotten bosses.
Strikers voted to accept the deal by 377 to 276 votes on a turnout of 78 percent. But 42 percent voted to rejectâand fight to win more.
Unite says strikers won a 10.74 percent increase, or ÂŁ3,125, with a ÂŁ700 one-off payment. In reality the strikers have agreed a ÂŁ1,200 pay offer from St Mungoâs, which is around 4.2 percent for some workers.
On 21 July Unite said, “St Mungoâs increased its pay offer from 2.25 percent to a paltry 3.7 percent. This is despite St Mungoâs having ÂŁ16 million in cash and substantial reserves. The pay offer was rejected.”
Yet something very close to that “paltry” offer is now supposed to be a great victory.
For 2021-22, St Mungoâs workers received the national joint council (NJC) pay award of ÂŁ1,925 and a ÂŁ700 split across two payments from bosses. The NJC is a body of bosses and unions that negotiates pay for local government. The 2023-24 NJC pay offer hasnât yet been agreed and will be paid in addition to the new ÂŁ1,200.
Strikers were originally fighting for a 10 percent increase on top of the NJC award.
One striker, Morgan, said the result was âdisappointingâ. âWhen we were phone banking against the deal, people sounded tired rather than thinking it was a good deal,â they told Socialist Worker. âWe were fighting for 10 percent, but every time bosses included the NJC payment Unite was criticising them saying it wasn’t enough.
âItâs ludicrous that Unite is now painting it as a win, and criminal itâs adding figures together. The fact 276 people rejected shows a lot of people who were actually out wanted to keep going. Large numbers were horrified by the deal.
âWe have to be clear that in the last few meetings the tone from Unite officials and some reps has been incredibly negative. Theyâve been pushing the idea that weâve gone as far as we can.
âTheyâve offered no leadership or a plan in terms of where next or how to take the dispute forward. Thatâs been part of the problemâpeople are tired but they couldâve kept going if there was a strategy.
âThe ban of agency workers on 10 August gave us a bit of direction. But there was a keenness to get settled. We also need to be clear that poor offers were institutionalised by our convenor very early on. He told the management team he was happy to take these kinds of offers.â
The convenor argued early in the strike that St Mungoâs didnât have enough funds, which Unite was slow to debunk. âThe convenor showed himself as happy to not just accept but be a salesperson for the bad offers,â Morgan said.
Unite then brought in its âkey negotiatorâ to get a âbetterâ deal. But this also came after Unite tried to convince the strikers to go back into work for three weeks in the lead up to 10 August. Â
General secretary Sharon Graham only visited pickets halfway through the dispute, and Unite didnât make it a national focus for solidarity or fight for an all-London demonstration.
And union leaders undermined the strikersâ participation and democracy. It stopped the strike committees from taking over the running of the dispute, and kept members out of repsâ meetings.
Unite also didnât stop reps changing their recommendation of the deal from reject to neutral, or stop the convenor and some reps from pushing it. âRepeatedly balloting members isnât a strategy either, this was our fourth since 4 July, and members didnât want that,â Morgan said.
âThe strategy shouldâve been if itâs a poor offer, we wonât bother to entertain itâthat didnât happen for most of the negotiations.â
Morgan added, âThe offer is poor but itâs more than what our intransigent CEO wanted to payâwhich was nothing. Thatâs come about after 13 weeks of indefinite strikes being sustained by strikers who were learning on the job how to bring their strike forward.
âMembers were key to organising pickets, responding with different rallies and locations. A key section of the dispute set up strike committees and showed themselves to be brilliant fighters. Members were prepared to go the distance to find creative ways to sustain the strike, and weâre proud of that.â
Morgan said that the key now is to âbuild on the increased and engaged membership.â âItâs clear that some reps are not up to it, especially those who were going in,â they said. âWe need to freshen up the people leading and taking position and continue to build within St Mungoâs and challenge the culture or corporatisation.
âThe attacks arenât going away. Weâre not atomised across workplaces anymore. After 13 weeks weâre a stronger and more united workforce at rank and file level. Weâre still holding our national demonstration to connect with the broader issues in our sector, and weâll take confidence in the things that have gone well.â
St Mungoâs strikersâ hard-fought battle was not in vain. They showed the potential workers have to take control of their own strike and find new ways of keeping it going for 13 weeks.
But a warning to all trade unionists has to be that indefinite strikes on their own arenât enough. It will still take grassroots organisation to stop union officials pushing through compromise and concession.
- Join the Workers’ Summit on 23 September to link the fights and stop bad deals. Register at bit.ly/WS230923. Â To add your union branch to the supporting organisations, or for a model motion, contact [email protected]Â
- Join the national march for the homelessness sector, on Saturday 2 September. Assemble near Waterloo, central London, to the Department of Levelling Up
Morgan is a pseudonymÂ
Source: Socialistworker.co.uk