The Three Big Lies Pertaining to Ukraine:
- The Westâs leaders never promised Mikhail Gorbachev and his foreign minister Eduard Shevardnadze not to expand NATO eastward. They also did not state that they would take serious Soviet/Russian security interests around its borders. And therefore, each of the former Warsaw Pact countries has a right to join NATO if they decide to freely.
- The Ukraine conflict started by Putinâs out-of-the-blue aggression on Ukraine and then annexation of Crimea.
- NATO always has an open door to new members. It never tries to invite or drag them in, doesnât seek expansion. It just happens because East European countries since 1989-90 have wanted to join without any pressure from NATOâs side. That also applies to Ukraine.
Lie # 1 â The West never promised Gorbachev not to expand NATO
Concerning the first lie, listen to or read US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, here on January 7, 2022.
Here he presents a series of accusations and empirical lies about Russian politics and behaviours, predictably omitting every mention of the simple fact that it takes two to have a conflict and defying Eric Claptonâs wise advice that âbefore you accuse me, take a look at yourself.â His body language and submachine gun stumbling way of speaking reveal that he is perfectly aware that he is lying. Note in passing that the journalists present ask only âunderstandingâ questions. The whole thing smacks the Soviet Union shortly before its collapse.
Why is it so evident that he lies?
TFF has reproduced two essential pieces from the National Security Archive at George Washington University with irrefutable documentation that Gorbachev indeed was given such assurances â âcascadesâ of them! as is stated in the articles â by all the most influential Western leaders at the end of 1989 and into 1990:
âNATO Expansion: What Gorbachev heardâ â and
âNATO Expansion: The Budapest Blow Up 1994â
Read them, and you will be shocked.
Youâll find that they have lots of notes and, in sum, no less than 48 original historical documents. For instance, here is just one of the 48 informing us about then NATO Secretary-General Manfred Woernerâs view and statement:
Woerner had given a well-regarded speech in Brussels in May 1990 in which he argued: âThe principal task of the next decade will be to build a new European security structure, to include the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact nations. The Soviet Union will have an important role to play in the construction of such a system. If you consider the current predicament of the Soviet Union, which has practically no allies left, then you can understand its justified wish not to be forced out of Europe.â
Now in mid-1991, Woerner responds to the Russians by stating that he personally and the NATO Council are both against expansion â â13 out of 16 NATO members share this point of viewâ â and that he will speak against Polandâs and Romaniaâs membership in NATO to those countriesâ leaders as he has already done with leaders of Hungary and Czechoslovakia. Woerner emphasizes that âWe should not allow [âŠ] the isolation of the USSR from the European community.
This is just one of the âcascadesâ of statements and assurances given to the Russians at the time. Over 30 years ago, 13 out of 16 members were against NATO expansion because they respected Russiaâs crisis and legitimate security interests! Today â 2022 â NATO has 30 members!
Is the U.S. Secretary of State, his advisors and speechwriters unaware of the next-door National Security Archives? Are we really to believe that they have no clue about the conditions and dialogues at the end of the first Cold War? If so, they ought to resign or be fired for their unbelievable incompetence.
If not so â if they know the content of these historical documents â Mr Blinken, his advisors and speechwriters know that they lie.
Lie # 2 â It all started with Putin snatching Crimea
The second lie is a lie by omission. Antony Blinken and almost all Western politicians, including the NATO S-G, and mainstream media simply omit that the West attempted a regime change in Kyiv in 2014 and that Putinâs reacted to it by annexing Crimea.
The Maidan riots took place in February 2014, the sniper fire on February 20. Russia formally annexed â or accepted self-determination â of Crimea on March 18. The complex Western-instigated and -financed turmoil was orchestrated by the EU, US and NATO leadership, as you can read in articles or books by people who know such as Gordon M Hahn and Richard Sakaw (âFrontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlandsâ), Stephen Cohen, Henry Kissinger and many more here.
To put it crudely, the conflict issue was the Western attempt at getting Ukraine to side not with Russia but with Western institutions, the EU and, later, NATO. One problem would be Russian-speaking minorities, the opinion polls concerning NATO membership which were not in favour and, more strongly, that Russia would a) never accept Ukraine in NATO â but very well as a neutral state between â and neither that Russiaâs extensive military base in Crimea, on lease for 30+ years ahead, should end up being located in a NATO country.
This entire regime-change policy under the Obama administration was one big insensitive and plain foolish idea also in the light of the old promises given to Gorbachev.
But of course, that cannot be admitted today, eight years later. To cover it up, the US/NATO must blame the present situation on Russia, on Russia only. Russia annexed Crimea for no good reason; nothing âweâ did preceded that move or could explain it.
Like with the lie about promises never given to Gorbachev and this omission of Western regime change in Ukraine, one must ask: Are they really so desperate and so politically naive that they believe that we neither remember nor can put 2 + 2 together?
Lie # 3 â NATO doesnât seek expansion, it merely has an open door to all potential new members who qualify.
Now to the third lie. Itâs stated repeatedly and in a larger context by NATOâs Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg here:
NATO as an alliance has enormous resources to influence opinions in potential member states. Contrary to his open door talk, NATOâs Charter speaks only about inviting new members, not about holding a door open for anyone who might want to join.
It should be well-known by now â but isnât â that in the late 1990s, Vladimir Putin asked to join NATO â but it didnât happen, did it, Mr Stoltenberg? And why not? Because Putin â Russia â wanted to be invited as an equal partner and not sit and wait till Montenegro had become a member, to put it bluntly. NATO decided to close the door at Putinâs request.
This â fantastic â story is told by a former NATO Secretary-General, George Robertson; there is no reason to assume that is not credible or just a rumour. Or, for that matter, that Putin was not serious.
And what an exciting thought: Russia in NATO! Who would Mr Stoltenberg and Mr Blinken â and all the rest of the Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex, MIMAC â then have to put all the blame on? How then legitimate NATOâs permanent armament and its 12 times higher military expenditures than Russiaâs?
Mr Stoltenberg must know that he lies when saying NATO has an open door. It doesnât for Russia. It doesnât even have open ears for Russiaâs legitimate security concerns. But it knows how it would never accept what it requires Russia to accept. Here is a quotation from January 14, 2022, documenting the double-standard, the exceptionalist self-understanding of the US:
âUS will act âdecisivelyâ if Russia deploys military to Cuba or Venezuela.â â The White House
United States National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan called the idea âbluster in the public commentaryâ and noted that the deployment of Russian military infrastructure to Latin America was not a point of discussion at the recent Russia-US Strategic Stability Dialogue in Geneva.
âIf Russia were to move in that direction, we would deal with it decisively,â he said, responding to a question from a journalist.
The US opposition to Russian troop placement in the Americas may raise some eyebrows in Moscow, which has repeatedly complained about US armed forces being located near Russiaâs western frontier.â (Russia Today, January 14, 2022)
Finally, Mr Stoltenberg is very proud of NATOâs generous training and assistance to potential NATO members. Before they are admitted, they must go through all kinds of reforms and accept practical, military and political support. And what is the real purpose of all that training and generous help? Stoltenberg says it in the video:
ââŠIt also makes the societies of Ukraine and Georgia stronger. So resilient, well-functioning societies are also less vulnerable from interference from Russia.â
In plain Realpolitik language: the goal is to disconnect countries from Russiaâs influence, program them for NATO membership and then they decide in complete freedom to ask to become members.
Remember, NATO never drags in members. NATO set up its office in Kyiv in 1994. And here youâll see how Olga Stefanishyna, Ukraineâs deputy prime minister, standing at NATOâs HQ with Stoltenberg, consistently talking about NATO as Ukraineâs âallies,â expecting all kinds of guarantees and â in Foreign Policy of course â argues that Ukraine Needs a Clear Path to NATO Membership in the face of Russian aggression.
Accumulate expectations and add a series of lies when Reality emerges as a train coming against you in a dark tunnel. And you have the perfect recipe for war â Cold or Warm. Or both.
Source: Dissidentvoice.org